Dogsitter sues ex-worker and rival for £20,000 over claims he ‘punched and abused’ animals

A dogsitter who charges up to £13,000-a-year to look after some of London’s most pampered pets is suing an ex-worker and rival business for £20,000 over claims he ‘punched and abused’ animals in his care.

Oliver Sciota says lies posted online, in the form of ‘terrible comments’ on Instagram and ‘one-star negative reviews’ on Yell and Google, risked ending his company, For Dog’s Sake Ltd.  

He claims former employee Adam Tanner, who he says worked for the company for just two days last year, made a scathing assessment of the business on social media, alleging canine abuse, and that ‘horrible staff’ turned his short time there into his ‘worst nightmare’. 

Mr Sciota, 38, is claiming libel damages of £10,000 from Mr Tanner, and the same amount from Hampshire-based Doggieville Pet Services, over ‘groundless’ reviews allegedly posted by its manager Hollie Colenutt.

The businessman says in court papers: ‘One star negative reviews can destroy any type of business, but in particular when dealing with a dog related business it can potentially end it completely.’

But both Mr Tanner and Doggieville deny liability, with Mr Tanner claiming he was genuinely concerned for the dogs and his comments were ‘an honestly and reasonably held statement of opinion.’

Oliver Sciota, who charges up to £13,000-a-year looking after the pampered pets of well-heeled Londoners, says lies on social media - including that his staff were seen to 'punch and smack' dogs - risked ending his successful business

Oliver Sciota, who charges up to £13,000-a-year looking after the pampered pets of well-heeled Londoners, says lies on social media - including that his staff were seen to 'punch and smack' dogs - risked ending his successful business

Oliver Sciota, who charges up to £13,000-a-year looking after the pampered pets of well-heeled Londoners, says lies on social media – including that his staff were seen to ‘punch and smack’ dogs – risked ending his successful business

He is now suing former worker, Adam Tanner (pictured), who he says worked for the company for just two days last year

He is now suing former worker, Adam Tanner (pictured), who he says worked for the company for just two days last year

He is now suing former worker, Adam Tanner (pictured), who he says worked for the company for just two days last year

According to claim documents, the comments were initially posted on Instagram in October last year by Mr Tanner, a former worker who had been hired as a ‘freelance dog day care assistant and dog walker’.

‘Lovely dogs horrible staff…Something needs to be done about this…. I just feel so bad for these babies… This should’ve been my dream job but it turned into my worst nightmare,’ it said.

Ms Colenutt became involved when she, along with a number of other people, posted online messages relating to the claims, allegedly writing a one-star Google review, and contacting one of his clients directly to suggest that For Dog’s Sake was not properly registered.

Mr Sciota denies that his company mistreated dogs, pointing out that the local council in Merton, south west London, had never received a complaint about For Dog’s Sake and had confirmed that it was properly registered.

The RSPCA had also looked into the allegations last October and found the dogs there were not in overcrowded spaces and were clean and happy.

He had been planning to expand the company from its London base to become a nationwide service, but the online ‘trolling’ had put ‘immense strain’ on the business’ growth.

‘All these negative reviews and comments made on social media and on different advertising platforms such as Yell and Google were made by individuals that have never even visited our grounds, have no dogs of their own in our care and don’t possess the professional experience to judge business,’ Mr Sciota said.

‘We have a great reputation and have worked very hard to reach this level of success.

‘At no point were any dogs and/or any other pet or animal intentionally harmed by any of the claimant’s employees.’

For Dog’s Sake Ltd’s claim is for £10,000 damages each for libel and malicious falsehood from both Mr Tanner and Doggieville, plus a written apology from both stating the ‘falsity and dishonesty’ of allegations so that it can be shared with clients.

In his written defence to the claim, Mr Tanner’s barrister Mina Heung points out that For Dog’s Sake was not even mentioned in the Instagram post, which was permanently removed on the same day, and so could not have been harmed.

He also denies ‘spreading rumours’ about For Dog’s Sake and says the suggestion there was a plan to ruin the company’s reputation is ‘audacious and vehemently rejected,’ the barrister continues.

He is also suing Doggieville Pet Services for online messages by its manager Hollie Colenutt (pictured) relating to the claims, which he says were totally groundless

He is also suing Doggieville Pet Services for online messages by its manager Hollie Colenutt (pictured) relating to the claims, which he says were totally groundless

He is also suing Doggieville Pet Services for online messages by its manager Hollie Colenutt (pictured) relating to the claims, which he says were totally groundless

In his written defence to the claim, Mr Tanner's (pictured) barrister Mina Heung points out that For Dog's Sake was not even mentioned in the Instagram post, which was permanently removed on the same day, and so could not have been harmed

In his written defence to the claim, Mr Tanner's (pictured) barrister Mina Heung points out that For Dog's Sake was not even mentioned in the Instagram post, which was permanently removed on the same day, and so could not have been harmed

In his written defence to the claim, Mr Tanner’s (pictured) barrister Mina Heung points out that For Dog’s Sake was not even mentioned in the Instagram post, which was permanently removed on the same day, and so could not have been harmed

‘The allegations contained in the Instagram account do not identify the claimant at all,’ she says.

‘In any event, the words represent the truth and an honestly and reasonably held statement of opinion.

‘He believes the allegation complained of was a statement on a matter of public interest, that is, the welfare of the dogs.’

Ms Colenutt, in Doggieville’s defence, denies leaving a negative review on Yell or Google, insisting that she was not the author.

‘The comment I made on Instagram was my honest opinion,’ she says.

‘The claimant has removed my comment from his Instagram almost immediately. The claimant failed to provide any proof that the comments I made were slanderous or caused any damage.’

She denies saying that any dog abuse actually happened and says statements she made in private messages to clients were simply her ‘honest opinion.’

‘The claimant has not submitted any proof that he has suffered serious harm (or) that as a direct and natural result of the publication they have suffered loss that can be specified in monetary terms,’ she says.

‘I did not make any comments confirming Mr Tanner’s allegations with regard to the claimant.

‘Any and all communications both public and private made by me with regard to the claimant’s business are within the scope of the defence (of) honest opinion and public interest,’ she concluded.

The case is set to reach court for a pre-trial hearing next month. 

Link hienalouca.com

Advertising:

Tips to Find Low Priced Luxury Holiday Package Deals Fast

For most families, it has already been a common practice to spend the Holiday season in a foreign location. This is caused by the aviation market changes which have given a lot of benefits for people who travel a lot. Airfares going to different tourist destinations are becoming more inexpensive. What does this mean? If there is a perfect time to purchase luxury holiday package deals, now it the right time! Based on the market trend nowadays, you can save both money and time when you go for a luxury holiday. There are countless offers that combine travel and accommodation in one package which is a lot cheaper than getting separate deals. Aside from that, it is also risky to individually book the services that you need for the vacation. You might end up missing out on some important details of the trip. Unlike when you take advantage of luxury holiday package deals, you can be sure that everything is organized meticulously and according to what you really need. Nonetheless, you would still need to carefully select the package that would fit your needs. Review the following tips in getting packages that are reasonably priced. · Normally, luxury tour packages include accommodation, flight travel and transportation to individual tourist destinations. It would be best to choose the complete package so you won’t have to worry about other vacation elements. In addition to that, these are the packages that have the biggest discounts. · You can get big mark down prices, if you will purchase more packages. It is not a bad idea to share the wonderful moment with your loved ones. By doing so, you would not only enjoy, you will also save more money. You can even use your savings for other activities on your vacation. · It would be best to know how much you are willing to pay for the luxury tour packages. You can already work around your budget. You have to stick to your budget. If not, you might end up spending a lot and you will be left with less money for your vacation. · Prices may vary depending on the destination of the tour. You can do a research about places that are attractive yet inexpensive. There are thousands of destinations and you just have to choose wisely. · There are packages that include recreational activities. This means that you are paying for all the activities when you purchase these packages. The right thing to do is to make sure that the activities that are included would be the ones that you really enjoy. There is no sense in paying for activities that will not really make your vacation memorable. If you are going with friends, you should also consider their preferences so that you can be sure that everyone will enjoy the trip. There are other ways on how you can be sure that you are getting the best deal for your luxury holiday vacation. No matter how you choose to do it, you have to get adequate information about the packages. This will help you determine whether it is worth the price.

(Total views: 49 Time, 1 visits per day)

Leave a Reply