Dan Osborne claims Boris Johnson is ‘blackmailing people into Covid vaccination’

Anti-vaxxer Dan Osborne claimed Prime Minister Boris Johnson is ‘blackmailing people into having a Covid jab’ in a furious rant on Monday.  

The Prime Minister has proposed that, from September, proof of having both vaccinations will be required for large-scale ticketed events, nightclubs, and potentially even some pubs.

The former TOWIE star, 30, who has openly spoken about his decision not to vaccinate himself or his children, shared a tweet that compared the unvaccinated to paedophiles.

Fuming: Anti-vaxxer Dan Osborne claimed Prime Minister Boris Johnson is 'blackmailing people into having a Covid jab' in a furious rant on Monday

Fuming: Anti-vaxxer Dan Osborne claimed Prime Minister Boris Johnson is 'blackmailing people into having a Covid jab' in a furious rant on Monday

Fuming: Anti-vaxxer Dan Osborne claimed Prime Minister Boris Johnson is ‘blackmailing people into having a Covid jab’ in a furious rant on Monday

The tweet read: ‘How about passports and mandatory QR codes for pedophiles and rapists? Oh, that’s right. It goes against their human rights and it’s an invasion of their privacy. Pedophiles are safer than the unvaccinated!’ [sic]

Dan shared the tweet, adding: ‘Worlds a f***ing mess. Absolute joke!

‘Basically blackmailing people into having a jab if they really want life to go back to ‘normal’, even to go to nightclubs or most countries in the world on holiday…

‘Proper top class bulls***!’ [sic] 

Fuming: Dan shared a tweet that compared the unvaccinated to paedophiles

Fuming: Dan shared a tweet that compared the unvaccinated to paedophiles

Fuming: Dan shared a tweet that compared the unvaccinated to paedophiles

Dan shared the tweet, adding: 'Worlds a f***ing mess. Absolute joke! Basically blackmailing people into having a jab if they really want life to go back to 'normal', even to go to nightclubs or most countries in the world on holiday... Proper top class bulls***!' [sic]

Dan shared the tweet, adding: 'Worlds a f***ing mess. Absolute joke! Basically blackmailing people into having a jab if they really want life to go back to 'normal', even to go to nightclubs or most countries in the world on holiday... Proper top class bulls***!' [sic]

Dan shared the tweet, adding: ‘Worlds a f***ing mess. Absolute joke! Basically blackmailing people into having a jab if they really want life to go back to ‘normal’, even to go to nightclubs or most countries in the world on holiday… Proper top class bulls***!’ [sic]

His wife added: ‘Freedom? Really? World has gone mad!’

The vaccine has been, at the time of writing, administered to 54.2 per cent of the UK’s population.

Public Health England  statistics demonstrate that two doses of the vaccine will help in preventing symptoms from the Delta variant by 79 per cent. Two doses are 96 per cent effective at preventing hospitalisations. 

Dan has declared he won’t have the jab, nor will his children. Jacqueline Jossa and Dan share Ella, six, and Mia, two, and Dan has a son – Teddy, seven – from a previous relationship

Unvaccinated: Jacqueline and Dan share Ella, six, and Mia, two, and Dan has a son - Teddy, seven - from a previous relationship

Unvaccinated: Jacqueline and Dan share Ella, six, and Mia, two, and Dan has a son - Teddy, seven - from a previous relationship

Unvaccinated: Jacqueline and Dan share Ella, six, and Mia, two, and Dan has a son – Teddy, seven – from a previous relationship

News: The Prime Minister has proposed that, from September, proof of having both vaccinations will be required for large-scale ticketed events, nightclubs, and potentially even some pubs

News: The Prime Minister has proposed that, from September, proof of having both vaccinations will be required for large-scale ticketed events, nightclubs, and potentially even some pubs

News: The Prime Minister has proposed that, from September, proof of having both vaccinations will be required for large-scale ticketed events, nightclubs, and potentially even some pubs

Dan previously claimed that coronavirus ‘is not dangerous enough to be forcing a vaccine on the world’ – despite the illness killing 4.1m globally, at the time of writing. 

Last month Dan declared his anti-vaxxer status in a bizarre rant to his 1.1 million Instagram followers. The former TOWIE star took to social media to claim that the COVID-19 crisis is ‘all about money’, despite the pandemic causing a global recession which is the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

The rant began when he traveled home from Portugal and filmed himself in his car heading back from the airport.

‘I’ve said it from day one. People are going to have a go at me, but the whole thing is about money. The whole damn thing. I’ve had hundreds, maybe thousands of messages about kids getting the vaccination. Personally that s**t isn’t even going in me – never mind my kids. People do your research, it’s not good!’ he raged. 

U Ok hun? Dan came out as an anti-vaxxer in a bizarre rant to his 1.1 million Instagram followers

U Ok hun? Dan came out as an anti-vaxxer in a bizarre rant to his 1.1 million Instagram followers

U Ok hun? Dan came out as an anti-vaxxer in a bizarre rant to his 1.1 million Instagram followers

Oh dear! The former TOWIE star took to social media to claim that the COVID-19 crisis is 'all about money', despite the pandemic causing a global recession which is the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression of the 1930s

Oh dear! The former TOWIE star took to social media to claim that the COVID-19 crisis is 'all about money', despite the pandemic causing a global recession which is the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression of the 1930s

Oh dear! The former TOWIE star took to social media to claim that the COVID-19 crisis is ‘all about money’, despite the pandemic causing a global recession which is the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression of the 1930s

On arriving home, the ex-Celebrity Big Brother contestant returned to his Instagram Stories, having clearly been met with a slew of outraged messages from fans slamming his anti-vaxxer stance.

He said: ‘People are going mad at me for talking bad about the vaccine. You guys are crazy!

‘All I’m saying is if there was a legitimate vaccine that actually works and is no harm to you, why would it not just be all the vulnerable people get the vaccine and that’s it.

Rant: He also claimed that coronavirus 'is not dangerous enough to be forcing a vaccine on the world' and that he won't be getting the jab - and neither will his three young children

Rant: He also claimed that coronavirus 'is not dangerous enough to be forcing a vaccine on the world' and that he won't be getting the jab - and neither will his three young children

Rant: He also claimed that coronavirus ‘is not dangerous enough to be forcing a vaccine on the world’ and that he won’t be getting the jab – and neither will his three young children

‘Why would a 12-year-old kid need a vaccine. If all the vulnerable people had had it and they were safe, why would anyone else need it? You just wouldn’t because it’s a 99.6 percent chance that you’re going to be fine with COVID-19.

‘It’s not dangerous enough to be forcing it on the world. That to me is suspect!’

Dan was then seen later in the evening asking his followers to stop bombarding him with responses, clearly having faced a backlash from them.

He was seen drinking beer and eating a take-out to cheer himself up, adding that he was feeling ‘nervous’ after the barrage of comments he had been inundated with after his rant.

HOW LIKELY ARE YOU TO GET COVID-19 AFTER BEING FULLY VACCINATED?

So-called ‘breakthrough’ COVID-19 cases occur when people contract the disease 14 days or more after receiving their second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine or the Johnson & Johnson one-shot jab.

Clinical trials have shown that Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine is 95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease and the Moderna vaccine is 94.5% effective.

Meanwhile, real-world data showed the Pfizer jab is 91% effective against all disease for at least six months and the Moderna vaccine is 90% effective.

This means that fully vaccinated people are between 90% and 95% less likely to develop COVID-19 than unvaccinated people.

In addition, Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine trials showed 72% efficacy in the U.S., meaning those who got the one-shot jab are 72% less likely to contract the disease.

When comparing fully vaccinated people who did and did not get sick, the risk is even lower.

The most recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data show that 10,262 of at least 133 million Americans who have been fully vaccinated against COVID-19 later contracted the disease.

This translates to 0.00716% of people who have completed their vaccine series have gone on to test positive.

It also represents the true odds of getting COVID-19 after full vaccination: less than 0.01%.

What’s more, fully vaccinated people who test positive have mild illnesses, and are very unlikely to be hospitalized or die.

The CDC states that 99.5% of all deaths occur in unvaccinated people.

That means, if the figure applies to the 3,165 Americans who’ve died in July 2021 so far – as of July 13 – about 3,150 deaths would be among unvaccinated people and 15 deaths among fully vaccinated people.

<!—->

Advertisement

Link hienalouca.com

Advertising. Insurance companies have spent millions of dollars in research to determine what types of drivers and cars pose the most financial. Based On These results, They Have Come Up With A Formula That determined how Much IS A PARTICULAR driver charged in premiums. Based on these results, they developed a formula that determines how much a particular driver is charged in premiums. While this formula Is Only fully-Known to Cheapest Cars Insurance companies, it’s quite Obvious That Some coaches and people are less expensive to insure Than Others. Although this formula can not be fully known to insurance companies, it is clear that some cars and people are cheaper to insure than others. In this article, We Will Discuss The Particular attributes of car Which make it more expensive Then Another, to insure. In this article we will examine the characteristics of the car that make it more expensive than the other, to insure. Amounts are based premium Typically how expensive it IS The Car, The Size of the Car, whether or not It Is Targeted by Thieves and whether or not it can-do extensive damage to another car. the premiums are usually based on how the car is expensive, the size of the car, whether or not he is the target of thieves and whether or not it can do considerable damage to another car. Cars That Have less value (cost) Will Be Cheaper to Insure That Are More Than expensive cars. Cars that have less value (cost), will be less expensive to insure that cars are more expensive. This Is Because It Will Cost The Insurance companies less money to replace to replace golden shares The Entire because if It Is TotalEdit gold stolen. That’s because it will cost insurance companies less money to replace parts or to replace the whole car if it is reached or stolen. The Size of the year because est aussi important part of The Insurance cost equation. The size of the car is also an important part of the equation insurance costs. If a Car Is Too Small or Too Big, Then The insurance Will Be Higher. If a car is too small or too large, the insurance will be higher. This Is Because bigger cars can-do more damage to cars in crashes Other. This is because bigger cars can do more damage to other cars in accidents. The crash if it Is the driver’s fault With The bigger because, Then The insurance Likely Will Have to shell out Quite a bit of cash. If the accident is the fault of the driver with the highest car insurance will probably pay a little money. Cars That Are Too Small Have the opposite problem. Cars that are too small have the opposite problem. Often They Are Damaged And The occupants more more Likely To Suffer Injuries from crash related. They are most often damaged and the occupants more likely to suffer from injuries caused by accident. The least expensive cars to insure are Those That Are mid-sized. The cheapest cars to be insured are those of medium size. Therefor, if long-term Costs are year end for you, Be sure to purchase a mid-sized car. Therefore, if the long-term costs are a problem for you, be sure to buy a mid size car. Whether or not a car IS Typically Targeted by Thieves Is Another component to Calculating your insurance rates. Whether or not a car is typically targeted by thieves is another element for calculating your insurance premium. If your SI as Likely to Be Stolen, Then insurance companies assume more risk in Insuring you and subsequently, force you to pay more in premiums. If your car is likely to be stolen then insurance companies assume more risk by ensuring thereafter, forcing you to pay higher premiums. Keep This Is Mind, When you are looking for your next car. Keep this in mind when you’re looking for your next car. Insurance Companies Have A pretty Elaborate formula When It Comes to Deciding Who Will pay what, for Their policies. Insurance companies have a fairly complex formula when it comes to deciding who will pay anything for their policies. Owners of cars That Have to Pay The Least Amount of money for insurance are Those That Have Typically mid sized cars and vehicles Have That Are Not Targeted by thieves. Car owners have to pay less money for insurance are generally those with mid-size cars and vehicles that are not targeted by thieves. Individual year if IS are interested in. cutting back How Much THEY pay for insurance, They Will Need to Consider These Things When It Is Time to make a purchase. If someone is interested in cutting back on how much they pay for insurance, they will need to consider these things when it’s time to make a purchase. Insurance companies are all about Assessing Risk. Insurance companies are all about risk assessment. If They view you as a Financial Risk, They Will Make Sure That You pay more. If they see you as a financial risk, they should ensure that you pay more. This May SEEM unfair, however, insurance companies Have Done Numerous studies and Have Come Up With A profile is What types of drivers and cars Get Into The Most accidents and Will Likely cost em more money. This may seem unfair, however, insurance companies have done many studies and have developed a profile on what types of drivers and cars entering the most accidents and will likely cost more money. Will individualist thesis end up Paying more Then Someone That Does not exhibit thesis characteristics. These people end up paying more than someone who does not exhibit these characteristics. Therefor, try to stay away form high powered cars, vans That Are Extremely Large And That Can Do Major Damage To other cars on the road, cars are too small and That That Are Likely To Be Damaged Greatly if in a crash. Therefore, try to stay away from high-shaped electric cars, cars that are extremely important and can cause major damage to other cars on the road, cars that are too small and are likely to be so heavily damaged in an accident. Also, remember, the Less expensive because The IS, the Less You Will Probably Have to pay for insurance, Unless of course, because The IS small. Also, remember, the cheaper the car, the less you’ll probably have to pay for insurance, unless of course, the car is small.
(Total views: 64 Time, 1 visits per day)

Leave a Reply