Tate pusher was ‘NOT considered a risk to the public’ when he threw boy, six, from art gallery

The ‘premeditated’ assaults and threats to kill made by Jonty Bravery before he hurled boy, six, from top of the Tate Modern

Early 2017: Jonty Bravery strikes a child after losing a game at a ten pin bowling alley. He later bites a pupil to try and ‘draw blood’ and is violent against staff. The incidents were not reported to police with the school thought to have attributed the violence to his autism.

May 2017: Residential school moves Bravery on and advises Local Authority of the threat he poses to young people in a group environment. He is transferred to a new facility. 

While here, he assaults a leisure centre worker and damages a member of the public’s car. He then assaults a member of staff with a brick before stashing the brick and a pair of scissors in his room. 

He assaults a police officer and is taken into custody. He is released into his father’s custody and moves into a hotel.

Summer 2017: After assessments, care staff admit he was ‘lucky’ not to kill someone in May

October 2017: He is arrested after beating a care worker and dragging another along a corridor by the hair

August 2018: Jonty says he wants to kill others and himself. Police are called and he is arrested when he assaults an officer. After he is returned home he flings his own faeces out of the window at neighbours and verbally abuses them. He is given an absolute discharge over the assaults on two care workers in October 2017.

September 2018: He tells staff he wants to kill his stepmother and  sister.  

April 2019:  Bravery assaulted a member of staff at Burger King in Brighton after punching his care worker, who he also racially abused.

He is then arrested and assaults a police officer in the custody waiting room and urinates on the floor 

August 4, 2019:  Bravery throws the young boy from a 10th-floor balcony of the landmark museum on August 4 2019.

August 6, 2019: The Metropolitan Police charge Bravery with attempted murder and he appears in court later that day.  

December 6, 2019: Bravery pleads guilty to attempted murder.

June 25, 2020: Bravery is sentenced to 15 years in Broadmoor Hospital. 

December 2020: He is given another 14 weeks for punching a nursing assistant in the head and face before pulling her hair. He then bit rehabilitation therapist assistant Maxwell King.

<!—->

Advertisement

An autistic teenager who threw a six-year-old boy from the Tate Modern was not considered a risk to others at the time, despite at least eight assaults including on other children and police as well as threatening to kill his family

Jonty Bravery even hit a member of his support staff with a brick, threatened to kill his family and punched and racially abused another care worker in a Burger King just six months before the Tate attack.

Bravery was 17 when he told supervisors he was going to visit a local shopping centre on August 4, 2019, but instead travelled to the central London art gallery where, after lying in wait, he stalked, snatched and then hurled a young French tourist from the 10th storey viewing platform.

The child survived, but has undergone round-the-clock treatment since, while Bravery, who told horrified onlookers that social services were to blame for the atrocity, is currently serving a 15-year minimum prison term for attempted murder.

A serious case review into Bravery, published today, highlights a series of violent incidents in the two years before he struck, as well as other examples of troubling behaviour including putting faeces in his mother’s make-up brushes or throwing it out of his window at neighbours as well as threatening to kill members of the public.

One support worker said they believed it was ‘only by luck’ he hadn’t killed someone, while Bravery’s attacks were often premeditated and appeared to give him pleasure, especially when he drew blood after he bit another child.

Five months before the Tate attack, he assaulted a member of staff at Burger King in Brighton after punching his care worker, who he also racially abused.  A year earlier he told a support worker he was ‘planning to kill/hurt his stepmother and sister if had an opportunity and wanted to be arrested and go to prison’. But care workers decided that he didn’t mean it and it was attention seeking.   

Today’s report, published by the Local Safeguarding Children Partnership in West London, fails to blame anyone for Bravery being free to attack the poor French boy seeing London from the Tate viewing gallery, where he was grabbed and thrown on to a roof below.

Investigators concluded that Bravery’s violent behaviour had reduced at the time of the Tate Modern attack, while he was living in a bespoke placement with two-to-one care.

The report states: ‘There was no recent evidence that he (Bravery) presented a risk to other children or adults unknown to him.

‘It was in this context that he was progressively given more freedoms, which saw him able to visit central London unaccompanied on the day of the incident.’

Jonty Bravery, 19, is serving a 15-year prison sentence for attempted murder, but despite repeated violence against others he was not considered a risk and nobody is to blame, a report concluded today

Jonty Bravery, 19, is serving a 15-year prison sentence for attempted murder, but despite repeated violence against others he was not considered a risk and nobody is to blame, a report concluded today

Jonty Bravery, 19, is serving a 15-year prison sentence for attempted murder, but despite repeated violence against others he was not considered a risk and nobody is to blame, a report concluded today

The French boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was on holiday in London with his family at the time of the incident. Pictured, emergency crews attending the scene at the Tate Modern art gallery on August 4, 2019

The French boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was on holiday in London with his family at the time of the incident. Pictured, emergency crews attending the scene at the Tate Modern art gallery on August 4, 2019

The French boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was on holiday in London with his family at the time of the incident. Pictured, emergency crews attending the scene at the Tate Modern art gallery on August 4, 2019

Bravery shoved the boy from the viewing balcony at London's Tate Modern art gallery in August last year. He was sentenced to life in prison at the Old Bailey in June

Bravery shoved the boy from the viewing balcony at London's Tate Modern art gallery in August last year. He was sentenced to life in prison at the Old Bailey in June

Bravery shoved the boy from the viewing balcony at London’s Tate Modern art gallery in August last year. He was sentenced to life in prison at the Old Bailey in June 

A timeline of Jonty Bravery’s movements before and after the Tate attack on August 4, 2019

12.16pm: Jonty Bravery, a then-17-year-old autistic boy living in supported accommodation, leaves his home in Ealing, west London, to buy an Oyster card at a shop on Church Road, Northolt.

12.23pm: He arrives at Northolt Underground station and takes the Tube to London Bridge station.

1.10pm: Bravery arrives at London Bridge station, on the South Bank, and makes his way the short distance to the Shard.

Once there, he asks a member of staff how much it costs to enter but does not have enough money. CCTV footage then shows him walking away before turning back to ask for directions elsewhere.

2.16pm: Bravery arrives at the Tate Modern on foot, speaks to a member of staff and is seen pointing upwards. He then takes the lift to the 10th floor viewing balcony in the visitor attraction’s Blavatnik Building.

2.30pm: CCTV shows Bravery looking over the railings close to where a six-year-old French boy is later hurled. 

2.32pm: The victim and his parents arrive on the viewing tower where Bravery has been waiting. The boy skips ahead of his parents briefly, allowing Bravery to scoop him up and throw him over the edge.

Bravery then moves away and can be seen smiling, with his arms raised. The victim’s parents panic – the father challenges Bravery while the mother attempts to climb over the barriers to her son, 100ft (30m) below, before being stopped by witnesses.

Members of the public detain Bravery, remarking he seems ‘calm’ and ‘lacking emotion’. He later is heard saying: ‘It’s not my fault, it’s social services’ fault.’

2.46pm: Bravery is arrested. He asks: ‘Is this going to be on the news?’

<!—->

Advertisement

But the review also found that, while Bravery’s case was characterised by ‘appropriate efforts by professionals from across agencies to access assessment and treatment for (him)’, those efforts ‘were stymied due to the lack of services, placements and provisions that were suitable for his needs as an autistic young person with a co-existing conduct disorder diagnosis’.

It makes seven findings, including a lack of residential treatment options for young people with high-risk behaviours, emerging personality disorder and co-existing autism, and disincentives for support staff to escalate service gaps, creating an unmet need on behalf of the service user.

The serious case review said Bravery was diagnosed with autism at the age of five, but that there was a clear ‘lack of join-up between different elements of support that were being provided to (Bravery) and his family’, and that he was not known to Children’s Social Care or Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) until more than a decade later.

Bravery, who was not diagnosed with an anti-social personality disorder until he was arrested for the Tate Modern attack, spent various periods of time being moved from psychiatric intensive care units, specialist residential schools and hotels from the age of 15 as his behaviour became more troubling.

His father told the review he felt ‘frustrated’ at the apparent lack of expertise of private care providers in dealing with his son.

The review said Bravery was taken to hospital twice in May 2016, once for overdosing on tea tree oil and then for purposely ingesting paint in an art lesson. His medication was increased and he was treated for two weeks on an inpatient psychiatric unit.

But that unit was said to be an ‘extremely stressful environment’ for someone with autism, as was the psychiatric intensive care unit in northern England where he spent several months – an experience his parents described as ‘extremely damaging to his wellbeing’.

Bravery was then sent to a residential school, where he attacked a fellow pupil after losing a game of 10-pin bowling – the review stated the injuries ‘could have been life-threatening’.

The local authority approached ‘over 60 establishments’ to find a suitable alternative for Bravery, but all ‘either felt that (Bravery) presented a higher risk than they could safely manage, or had no vacancies’, the review found.

He was sent to a specialist children’s home where his brief stay was characterised by ‘several violent incidents’, including one occasion when he assaulted a member of staff with a brick after being told his poor behaviour at a local leisure centre would be documented on his behaviour report.

A few days later, Bravery assaulted a police officer called to his room amid concerns that he was secreting a brick.

The teenager was later sent to live in a flat in west London but had to move to another facility after assaulting a member of care staff by dragging her along the floor by her hair.

The French boy, who was on holiday with his parents in London, survived the fall from the 10-storey balcony, but suffered life-changing injuries

The French boy, who was on holiday with his parents in London, survived the fall from the 10-storey balcony, but suffered life-changing injuries

The French boy, who was on holiday with his parents in London, survived the fall from the 10-storey balcony, but suffered life-changing injuries

A year before the Tate attack, Bravery called police to his flat, saying he was thinking of killing people, during which he assaulted an officer.

The following month he made two claims to support staff that he wanted to go out in the community ‘so that he could assault a member of the public and be arrested and put in prison’.

Staff believed he was making these statements to provoke a reaction from the support worker.

The review said: ‘It is evident that professionals working with (Bravery) at this time did not think he would act on these statements, which were seen as attention-seeking behaviour.

‘This was because all of (Bravery’s) actions were viewed as products of his autistic behaviour and there as no consideration of these threats in a context of conduct disorder.’

Five months before the Tate attack, he assaulted a member of staff at Burger King in Brighton after punching his care worker.

The review said: ‘Unfortunately (Bravery) also had incidents of premeditated instrumental aggression that were not explained by his autism and therefore were unlikely to be resolved through such therapy.

‘The fact that these incidents were rare, though could be dangerous, made it easier for them to drift from view.’

It found the ‘apparent abruptness of the escalation’ of Bravery’s situation – such as sending him to a psychiatric hospital at the age of 14 – to be a ‘striking feature’ of his case.

It added: ‘The mismatch between (Bravery’s) needs and available provision ran through the whole of (his) case.’

The review said Bravery, now 19, needed residential therapeutic solutions that could enable him, as an autistic young person, to engage in a treatment regime for his conduct disorder.

‘But such a residential option did not exist,’ it added.

‘This meant that the legal frameworks available provided limited options for Bravery at the time.’

Link hienalouca.com

Advertising:

Tips to Find Low Priced Luxury Holiday Package Deals Fast

For most families, it has already been a common practice to spend the Holiday season in a foreign location. This is caused by the aviation market changes which have given a lot of benefits for people who travel a lot. Airfares going to different tourist destinations are becoming more inexpensive. What does this mean? If there is a perfect time to purchase luxury holiday package deals, now it the right time! Based on the market trend nowadays, you can save both money and time when you go for a luxury holiday. There are countless offers that combine travel and accommodation in one package which is a lot cheaper than getting separate deals. Aside from that, it is also risky to individually book the services that you need for the vacation. You might end up missing out on some important details of the trip. Unlike when you take advantage of luxury holiday package deals, you can be sure that everything is organized meticulously and according to what you really need. Nonetheless, you would still need to carefully select the package that would fit your needs. Review the following tips in getting packages that are reasonably priced. · Normally, luxury tour packages include accommodation, flight travel and transportation to individual tourist destinations. It would be best to choose the complete package so you won’t have to worry about other vacation elements. In addition to that, these are the packages that have the biggest discounts. · You can get big mark down prices, if you will purchase more packages. It is not a bad idea to share the wonderful moment with your loved ones. By doing so, you would not only enjoy, you will also save more money. You can even use your savings for other activities on your vacation. · It would be best to know how much you are willing to pay for the luxury tour packages. You can already work around your budget. You have to stick to your budget. If not, you might end up spending a lot and you will be left with less money for your vacation. · Prices may vary depending on the destination of the tour. You can do a research about places that are attractive yet inexpensive. There are thousands of destinations and you just have to choose wisely. · There are packages that include recreational activities. This means that you are paying for all the activities when you purchase these packages. The right thing to do is to make sure that the activities that are included would be the ones that you really enjoy. There is no sense in paying for activities that will not really make your vacation memorable. If you are going with friends, you should also consider their preferences so that you can be sure that everyone will enjoy the trip. There are other ways on how you can be sure that you are getting the best deal for your luxury holiday vacation. No matter how you choose to do it, you have to get adequate information about the packages. This will help you determine whether it is worth the price.

(Total views: 278 Time, 1 visits per day)

Leave a Reply