Government MAY have given higher pay to civil servant because she is a black woman, says tribunal

HM Inspector of Police Wendy Williams may have been awarded a top pay packet as a result of positive discrimination, an employment tribunal has concluded

HM Inspector of Police Wendy Williams may have been awarded a top pay packet as a result of positive discrimination, an employment tribunal has concluded

HM Inspector of Police Wendy Williams may have been awarded a top pay packet as a result of positive discrimination, an employment tribunal has concluded

A senior civil servant may have been awarded a top pay packet because she is a black woman, an employment tribunal has concluded.

HM Inspector of Police Wendy Williams was used as a comparator to fellow HMI Matthew Parr, who was paid £52,000 less to do the same job.

He brought an employment tribunal case against the Home Office, claiming he had been discriminated against on the grounds of race and sex because he is a white man.

Home Secretary Priti Patel, backed by Mrs Williams, attempted to get salary calculations due to be disclosed by the tribunal made secret but their case was thrown out.

The Central London tribunal court has now ruled that Mr Parr was not discriminated against because he was the first of a new pay scale and therefore could not use Mrs Williams as a comparator.

However they concluded that the department had feared possible accusations around her salary and she had benefitted from positive discrimination.

Matthew Parr, one of the five HM Inspectors of Constabulary (HMIs) who oversee the UK’s police forces, claimed ‘ham-fisted’ attempts to lower hefty pay packets left him discriminated against because he is a white man.

The former Royal Navy officer and Rear Admiral took the £133,983 job in 2016 when Theresa May was Home Secretary.

He was given a further £7,904 London living allowance, but was still paid far less than Ms Williams, appointed 15 months earlier on a salary of more than £185,000 despite her pay bracket then being £165,000 to £185,000.

A Central London tribunal court ruled that Matthew Parr was not discriminated against because he was the first of a new pay scale and therefore could not use Mrs Williams as a comparator. However it was added that Mrs Williams benefitted from being a black woman that gave her a negotiating leverage in pay discussions

A Central London tribunal court ruled that Matthew Parr was not discriminated against because he was the first of a new pay scale and therefore could not use Mrs Williams as a comparator. However it was added that Mrs Williams benefitted from being a black woman that gave her a negotiating leverage in pay discussions

A Central London tribunal court ruled that Matthew Parr was not discriminated against because he was the first of a new pay scale and therefore could not use Mrs Williams as a comparator. However it was added that Mrs Williams benefitted from being a black woman that gave her a negotiating leverage in pay discussions

Employment Judge Richard Nicolle said: ‘We find that the fact of Ms Williams being a black woman, and the Respondent’s perception of the litigation and reputational risk she therefore potentially posed, to be the reason for this sudden and significant increase.

‘We do not consider it possible to apportion the extent to which the increase in Ms Williams’ pay was attributable to concerns regarding her sex or race as distinct protected characteristics but rather that her being a black woman gave her a negotiating leverage to increase her pay and as a result she benefited from because what arguably constituted positive discrimination in her favour.

‘We find that the Respondent viewed the Claimant as a white male to pose little legal and reputational risk should he seek to challenge his renumeration on equality/discrimination grounds.

‘We therefore find that the increase in Ms Williams’ salary from £165,000 to £185,791 was influenced by the Respondent’s concern that the initially proposed differential between her pay and that of the white incumbents could give rise to legal and reputational risks to the Home Office.

‘The differential was not due to the difference of sex but rather due to the positive discrimination from which Ms Williams benefitted. ‘

The Employment Judge continued: ‘The decision to increase Ms Williams’ pay may have constituted positive discrimination in her favour, at least in part is attributable to the Respondent’s perception that she as a black woman posed a greater litigation and reputational risk than the Claimant did at the time of his appointment.

‘It did not automatically constitute less favourable treatment of the Claimant on account of his race.’

At the time of her appointment, the Treasury was trying to cut costs and discussed paying her a similar salary to that Mr Parr was later to receive but decided there was a ‘risk of a legal challenge on the grounds of discrimination’ if they did that.

Mr Parr told an employment tribunal that she got her pay because the Home Office were concerned about ‘reputational damage’ and assumed he would accept the pay and not bring a claim.

The Employment Judge continued: 'The decision to increase Ms Williams' pay may have constituted positive discrimination in her favour, at least in part is attributable to the Respondent's perception that she as a black woman posed a greater litigation and reputational risk than the Claimant did at the time of his appointment'. Pictured: Victory House, central London's tribunal court

The Employment Judge continued: 'The decision to increase Ms Williams' pay may have constituted positive discrimination in her favour, at least in part is attributable to the Respondent's perception that she as a black woman posed a greater litigation and reputational risk than the Claimant did at the time of his appointment'. Pictured: Victory House, central London's tribunal court

The Employment Judge continued: ‘The decision to increase Ms Williams’ pay may have constituted positive discrimination in her favour, at least in part is attributable to the Respondent’s perception that she as a black woman posed a greater litigation and reputational risk than the Claimant did at the time of his appointment’. Pictured: Victory House, central London’s tribunal court

He is responsible for forces in London, Bedfordshire, Northern Ireland, the National Crime Agency, the Counter Terrorism Policing Network, national forces such as British Transport Police and forces in Overseas Territories.

He also looks after the London Fire Brigade and five other services.

Mrs Williams oversees forces in Wales and the west of England.

Mr Parr told the tribunal: ‘This is, for me, principally a question of fairness.

‘It is fundamentally unfair to pay people wildly different amounts for doing what is, by any measure, identical work.’

Employment Judge Richard Nicolle said: ‘We consider that cost considerations were a significant factor to the Respondent in assessing and setting the new salary scales.

‘The evidence points to significant pressure from the Treasury to reduce HMI pay because of austerity but also a perception that their pay was ‘excessive’ compared to other comparable public sector positions.

‘At the time of his appointment, we find that an equivalent black man would have been offered, and paid, the same remuneration as the Claimant.

‘Given that the benchmarking exercise had been undertaken, and the new salary scales set after Ms Williams’ appointment the Respondent has reason to pay a different salary to the Claimant.

‘Ms Williams is not therefore a correct comparator. We therefore reject the claims for direct race discrimination.’

The Home Office has been approached for comment. 

Link hienalouca.com

Advertising:

Tips to Find Low Priced Luxury Holiday Package Deals Fast

For most families, it has already been a common practice to spend the Holiday season in a foreign location. This is caused by the aviation market changes which have given a lot of benefits for people who travel a lot. Airfares going to different tourist destinations are becoming more inexpensive. What does this mean? If there is a perfect time to purchase luxury holiday package deals, now it the right time! Based on the market trend nowadays, you can save both money and time when you go for a luxury holiday. There are countless offers that combine travel and accommodation in one package which is a lot cheaper than getting separate deals. Aside from that, it is also risky to individually book the services that you need for the vacation. You might end up missing out on some important details of the trip. Unlike when you take advantage of luxury holiday package deals, you can be sure that everything is organized meticulously and according to what you really need. Nonetheless, you would still need to carefully select the package that would fit your needs. Review the following tips in getting packages that are reasonably priced. · Normally, luxury tour packages include accommodation, flight travel and transportation to individual tourist destinations. It would be best to choose the complete package so you won’t have to worry about other vacation elements. In addition to that, these are the packages that have the biggest discounts. · You can get big mark down prices, if you will purchase more packages. It is not a bad idea to share the wonderful moment with your loved ones. By doing so, you would not only enjoy, you will also save more money. You can even use your savings for other activities on your vacation. · It would be best to know how much you are willing to pay for the luxury tour packages. You can already work around your budget. You have to stick to your budget. If not, you might end up spending a lot and you will be left with less money for your vacation. · Prices may vary depending on the destination of the tour. You can do a research about places that are attractive yet inexpensive. There are thousands of destinations and you just have to choose wisely. · There are packages that include recreational activities. This means that you are paying for all the activities when you purchase these packages. The right thing to do is to make sure that the activities that are included would be the ones that you really enjoy. There is no sense in paying for activities that will not really make your vacation memorable. If you are going with friends, you should also consider their preferences so that you can be sure that everyone will enjoy the trip. There are other ways on how you can be sure that you are getting the best deal for your luxury holiday vacation. No matter how you choose to do it, you have to get adequate information about the packages. This will help you determine whether it is worth the price.

(Total views: 113 Time, 1 visits per day)

Leave a Reply