Developer is found not guilty of drowning his wealthy heiress wife at their Danish holiday home

The trial of a property developer accused of murdering his wealthy heiress wife in a holiday drowning ‘accident’ in Denmark to get his hands on a ‘vast fortune’ has collapsed.

Donald McPherson, 47, had taken out seven ‘secret’ life insurance policies on his ‘besotted’ wife Paula Leeson, 47, and stood to gain £3.5million if she died, Manchester Crown Court heard.

But on Wednesday in the third week of the trial, judge Mr Justice Goose halted proceedings in the absence of the jury, citing insufficient evidence for jurors to safely convict the defendant, who denied murder, as the prosecution case was built on circumstantial evidence.

As the ruling to stop the trial was made, Ms Leeson’s father, Irish businessman Willy Leeson, broke down in tears along with his wife Betty, as they sat in the public gallery yards from the defendant.

Mr Leeson shouted: ‘Oh God, oh God, unbelievable.’ His son Neville Leeson shouted to the judge: ‘God Almighty. You are making a big mistake.’

Donald McPherson (pictured), 47, from Sale, Greater Manchester, was accused of drowning his wife Paula Leeson, 47, while on holiday at a rented cottage with a swimming pool in Denmark

Donald McPherson (pictured), 47, from Sale, Greater Manchester, was accused of drowning his wife Paula Leeson, 47, while on holiday at a rented cottage with a swimming pool in Denmark

Paula Leeson, 47

Paula Leeson, 47

Donald McPherson (left), 47, from Sale, Greater Manchester, was accused of drowning his wife Paula Leeson (right), 47, while on holiday at a rented cottage with a swimming pool in Denmark

The family were absent from court on Thursday as Mr Justice Goose formally directed the jury forewoman to return a not guilty verdict to murder on the defendant.

He told the jury: ‘I have come to the conclusion that as a matter of law that the evidence in relation to how Paula Leeson came to drown is not sufficiently strong to allow you to reach a proper verdict in relation to the defendant causing it by killing her.’

The judge’s ruling to halt the trial was given to lawyers on Wednesday in the absence of the jury and could not be immediately reported.

The prosecution was given overnight while CPS lawyers ‘at the highest levels’ considered appealing against the ruling.

On Thursday morning, prosecutor David McLachlan QC told the court there are no reasonable grounds for appeal.

McPherson, who sat in the dock with his arms folded, wearing a black jogging suit and blue mask, made no reaction as he was discharged and told he was free to go.

He had been held in HMP Forest Bank.

Mr Justice Goose directed the jury forewoman to return a not guilty verdict to murder on the defendant. Pictured: Manchester Crown Court

Mr Justice Goose directed the jury forewoman to return a not guilty verdict to murder on the defendant. Pictured: Manchester Crown Court

Mr Justice Goose directed the jury forewoman to return a not guilty verdict to murder on the defendant. Pictured: Manchester Crown Court

The judge added: ‘I understand how difficult it will be therefore for the family to accept from their point of view the loss of a daughter. This court has obvious sympathy for them but the law must be applied equally.’

Ms Leeson, described as an otherwise healthy mother-of-one, drowned in a 4ft deep swimming pool at a holiday cottage while the couple were on a break in Denmark, on June 6, 2017.

The day after, the defendant transferred £27,000 from their joint account to his personal accounts to clear his £67,000 debts and seven days later he joined a group, Widowed and Young, he described as ‘Like Tinder for widows’, jurors were told.

Pathologists found 13 separate injuries on Ms Leeson’s body, which jurors heard may have been sustained while being restrained or in a rescue and resuscitation attempt.

Crucially, an accidental death could not be ruled out.

Stopping the trial, Mr Justice Goose said there were two available possibilities: Firstly, McPherson restrained his wife under water or overcame her in a struggle or pushed her to cause her to drown; Or secondly, Ms Leeson drowned by an accident, by a trip, fall or a faint, causing her to fall into the water.

He added: ‘Whilst the first of those alternatives is clearly more likely, that does not mean that a jury, on the face of the pathological evidence alone, could be sure of it.’

He said whilst the ‘substantial body of circumstantial evidence’ has caused ‘strong suspicion’ McPherson may have caused his wife’s death, it is ‘insufficient’ to disprove it was an accident.

Prosecutor Mr McLachlan told the jury Ms Leeson’s death ‘at first glance’ appeared to be a tragic accident, but he alleged it was ‘a sinister pre-planned killing’ by her husband, who was born Alexander James Lang and originally from New Zealand.

Ms Leeson’s family had told the jury McPherson ‘appeared out of nowhere’ and after a ‘whirlwind romance’ the couple wed two years after meeting in a ‘no expense spared’ ceremony at Peckforton Castle, Cheshire, in June 2014.

In the four years before her death, McPherson had taken out the seven life insurance policies and by 2016 was paying £464.47p-a-month premiums.

He never missed a payment despite sometimes being overdrawn as his debts began to ‘spiral out of control’ after buying and selling properties, the court heard.

As a birthday present, McPherson booked them a trip to a cottage in Norre Nebel on the coast of remote western Denmark in June 2017 – despite his wife ‘hating’ beach holidays.

On the day of her death, a health data app on Ms Leeson’s phone recorded her last movement at 1.13pm.

The next movement on McPherson’s phone was 26 minutes later, and at 1.46pm he called the emergency services.

McPherson told Danish police his wife had complained of stomach ache and toothache and she had been sick and they had both been in bed.

When he awoke his wife was gone and he found her fully clothed, face down in the swimming pool, not moving.

He said he struggled to pull her out, partly due to a shoulder injury, and called for an ambulance.

The Danish paramedic told the court she was already dead when they arrived and a doctor pronounced life extinct at 2.26pm.

Her death was initially treated as a tragic accident by the Danish authorities.

But as a routine post-mortem examination was carried out, bleeding was discovered in Ms Leeson’s neck and the procedure halted and police called.

Separate external injuries were recorded to her face and arms, described as bruises, abrasions or haemorrhages, with more internal injuries, including bleeding to the back of her neck, forehead and both temples.

Danish authorities initially concluded her death was ‘assumed accidental’, but later ruled the conclusion must be changed to ‘undetermined’.

They had been told Ms Leeson could not swim and had drowned in a pool with a depth of 5ft 9in.

Her family say she did not like swimming or water, she learned to swim at school and the pool was in fact under 4ft deep, with Ms Leeson 5ft 5in tall.

Ms Leeson had stood to inherit ‘millions’ from the family business owned by her father, who had built up a successful groundwork and skip hire firm in Sale, Greater Manchester, after emigrating from County Wicklow, Ireland, in the 1960s.

She oversaw the skip hire business – where she met McPherson, who renovated and sold on property.

He falsely claimed to own property in New Zealand, and gave the impression he was a ‘man of means’, but in reality was a ‘man of straw’ with substantial debt from property dealing, the court heard.

John Ryder QC, defending, in applying for the trial to be halted, said the prosecution case was entirely circumstantial, there was no real evidence against the defendant and it all amounted to, ‘He must have done it.’

McPherson, in a statement through his solicitors, said: ‘A tragic accident is what it was and it saddens me, deeply, that the events in question should ever have been seen differently and that I was ever suspected of playing a part in Paula’s death.’



Tips to Find Low Priced Luxury Holiday Package Deals Fast

For most families, it has already been a common practice to spend the Holiday season in a foreign location. This is caused by the aviation market changes which have given a lot of benefits for people who travel a lot. Airfares going to different tourist destinations are becoming more inexpensive. What does this mean? If there is a perfect time to purchase luxury holiday package deals, now it the right time! Based on the market trend nowadays, you can save both money and time when you go for a luxury holiday. There are countless offers that combine travel and accommodation in one package which is a lot cheaper than getting separate deals. Aside from that, it is also risky to individually book the services that you need for the vacation. You might end up missing out on some important details of the trip. Unlike when you take advantage of luxury holiday package deals, you can be sure that everything is organized meticulously and according to what you really need. Nonetheless, you would still need to carefully select the package that would fit your needs. Review the following tips in getting packages that are reasonably priced. · Normally, luxury tour packages include accommodation, flight travel and transportation to individual tourist destinations. It would be best to choose the complete package so you won’t have to worry about other vacation elements. In addition to that, these are the packages that have the biggest discounts. · You can get big mark down prices, if you will purchase more packages. It is not a bad idea to share the wonderful moment with your loved ones. By doing so, you would not only enjoy, you will also save more money. You can even use your savings for other activities on your vacation. · It would be best to know how much you are willing to pay for the luxury tour packages. You can already work around your budget. You have to stick to your budget. If not, you might end up spending a lot and you will be left with less money for your vacation. · Prices may vary depending on the destination of the tour. You can do a research about places that are attractive yet inexpensive. There are thousands of destinations and you just have to choose wisely. · There are packages that include recreational activities. This means that you are paying for all the activities when you purchase these packages. The right thing to do is to make sure that the activities that are included would be the ones that you really enjoy. There is no sense in paying for activities that will not really make your vacation memorable. If you are going with friends, you should also consider their preferences so that you can be sure that everyone will enjoy the trip. There are other ways on how you can be sure that you are getting the best deal for your luxury holiday vacation. No matter how you choose to do it, you have to get adequate information about the packages. This will help you determine whether it is worth the price.

(Total views: 92 Time, 1 visits per day)

Leave a Reply